(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Community Texts | Project Gutenberg | Children's Library | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Additional Collections
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload
See other formats

Full text of "Antiferromagnetic Spin Fluctuation above the Superconducting Dome and the Full-Gaps Superconducting State in LaFeAsO1-xFx Revealed by 75As-Nuclear Quadrupole Resonance"

Antiferromagnetic Spin Fluctuation above the Superconducting Dome and the 
Full-Gaps Superconducting State in LaFeAsOi^F,,, Revealed by 75 As-Nuclear 

Quadrupole Resonance 



(N 

o 



o 

o 

=5 

a- 



-a 
o 

(N 
> 



CN 

O 



X 



T. Oka 1 , Z. Li 2 , S. Kawasaki 1 , G. F. Chen 2 , N. L. Wang 2 , and Guo-qing Zheng 1 ^ 2 

1 Department of Physics, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8530, Japan and 

2 Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, 

Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 

(Dated: January 30, 2012) 

We report a systematic study by 75 As nuclear-quadrupole resonance in LaFeAsOi-^Fa;. The 
antiferromagnetic spin fluctuation (AFSF) found above the magnetic ordering temperature Tn — 
58 K for x — 0.03 persists in the regime 0.04 < x < 0.08 where superconductivity sets in. A dome- 
shaped ^-dependence of the superconducting transition temperature T c is found, with the highest 
T c = 27 K at x — 0.06 which is realized under significant AFSF. With increasing x further, the 
AFSF decreases, and so does T c . These features resemble closely the cuprates L^-^Sr^CuCU. In 
x — 0.06, the spin-lattice relaxation rate (1/Ti) below T c decreases exponentially down to 0.13 T c , 
which unambiguously indicates that the energy gaps are fully-opened. The temperature variation 
of 1/Ti below T c is rendered nonexponential for other x by impurity scattering. 



The discovery of superconductivity in LaFeAsOi-^Fj, 
at the transition temperature T c = 26 K [l| has gained 
much attention in the condensed-matter physics commu- 
nity. The electron -doping (F -doping) suppresses the 
antiferromagnetic ordering at TV — 140 K in LaFeAsO 
and high-T c superconductivity appears [lj. The T c sig- 
nificantly increases up to 55 K in RFeAsOi_ x F x (R: 
Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm) [2j, |3j]. To elucidate the mechanism of 
Cooper pairs formation in these arsenides, it is essen- 
tial to know the superconducting gap symmetry and the 
normal-state properties. Previous nuclear-magnetic reso- 
nance (NMR) and nuclear-quadrupole resonance (NQR) 
measurements have found that the superconductivity is 
in the spin-singlet state with multiple gaps 4-6]. Re- 
cent systematic measurements on Ba(Fei_ 2: Co 2 ,) i 2As2[7|, 
CaFe2As 2 under pressure 13, LaNiAsOi-^F^^], and 
BaFe2(Asi_ x P a: )2[lO| have suggested that the antiferro- 
magnetic spin fluctuation (AFSF) originated from their 
multiple electronic bands correlates with the appearance 
of the pertinent superconducting properties. On the 
other hand, there are also reports suggesting that AFSF 
is not important to realize high T c . 11 1 

For prototypical LaFeAsOi-^F^, several issues remain 
elusive. One is the role of AFSF. In cuprates, it has been 
believed that AFSF plays a crucial role to induce high-T c 
superconductivity, but the situation in LaFeAsOi^F^ is 
still unclear [5j, Il2|- 161. Some previous studies by NMR 
found no AFSF [UO. 

The second issue is the doping dependence of T c . It 
was initially reported that T c forms a wide plateau at 
0.04 < x < 0.12 [l|, which raises a question about the 
effect of doping. The third unresolved issue is the super- 
conducting gap symmetry. The spin-lattice relaxation 
rate (1/Ti) decreases sharply below T c , but the data 
were insufficient for dis ting uishing between d-wave from 
sign- reversal s-wave |5j, ll2Hl6j ] . From other experimen- 
tal probes, some measurements suggested the existence 



of node [Tjj , but the photoemission spectroscopy and the 
point contact Andreev reflection measurement suggested 
a nodeless gap 18[ [l9j . 

Here we report results of systematic 75 As NQR stud- 
ies on LaFeAsOi-^F,, (x = 0.03, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.10, 
and 0.15). An antiferromagnetic order with TV = 58 
K is found for x — 0.03. Bulk superconductivity sets 
in at T c = 21 K for x = 0.04, with strong AFSF. 
A dome-shaped x-dependence of T c is found, with the 
highest T c = 27 K at x — 0.06 which is realized un- 
der significant AFSF. With further doping, the AFSF 
is weakened and disappears for x > 0.10. Concomi- 
tantly, T c decreases. These features resemble closely the 
case of cuprates I^-^Sr^CuO^ and suggests that the 
AFSF is important in producing the superconductivity 
in LaFeAsOi-zFa; as well. The systematic observation 
of the AFSF in the low-doping regime is unprecedented, 
and the high quality samples enable us to reveal a dome 
shape of the T c which has a maximum at quite low x. In 
the superconducting state, 1/Ti for x = 0.06 decreases 
exponentially down to 0.13 T c , which is clear and direct 
evidence for a fully -gapped superconducting state. The 
T- variation of 1/Ti below T c is rendered nonexponential 
for x either smaller or larger than 0.06, showing a seem- 
ingly T 3 behavior for x — 0.10, which is accounted for by 
impurity scattering. 

The polycrystalline samples of LaFeAsOi^^F^ (x — 
0.03, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.10, and 0.15) were synthesized 
by the solid state reaction method |20l.l2l|. Here, x indi- 
cates the nominal composition of the starting material. 
Quite often, resistivity measurements give a higher T c 
than magnetic susceptibility or NQR. We define T c by 
the latter methods, ac susceptibility measurements using 
the in-situ NQR coil indicate T c = 21, 27, 23, 18, and 12 
K for x = 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.10, and 0.15, respectively. 
The 1/Ti decreases exactly below such-determined T c . 
The Ti is determined by an excellent fit to the single 



exponential curve 1 — ^jp- — exp(^^) 21|, where M 



MM - 
m - 

and M(t) are the nuclear magnetization in the thermal 
equilibrium and at a time t after the saturating pulse, 
respectively. 



right above Tjv and then decreases below, leaving a tiny 
peak at T/v- For x > 0.04, 1/Ti decreases rapidly be- 
low T c due to the opening of the superconducting energy 
gaps. 



Z 




10 12 14 

Frequency (MHz) 



0.04 0.08 0.12 
F content x 



FIG. 1: (color online) (a) Doping dependence of the 75 As- 
NQR spectrum for LaFeAsOi-^Fa; measured above T c . Data 
for x — 0.08 are from Ref.[g|. Solid curves are Lorentzian 
fittings which give a FWHM of ~ 0.95, 1.2, 1.8, and 2.3 MHz 
for x = 0.06, 0.08, 0.10, and 0.15, respectively, (b) The spec- 
tra above and below TV — 58 K for x — 0.03. (c) The x 
dependence of vq . 

Figure 1 (a) shows the 75 As-NQR spectrum for 0.04 
< x < 0.15 measured above T c . As seen in the fig- 
ure, a clear single peak, which can be fitted by a single 
Lorentzian curve, is observed for x > 0.06. The spectra 
do not change below T c . However, we observed two peaks 
for x = 0.03 (Fig. 1(b)) and 0.04. This indicates that 
there are two As -sites which are in different surround- 
ings. The NQR frequency vq increases with increasing 
x, as seen in Fig. 1(c). Here, ^q probes the electric- 
field gradient generated by the carrier distribution and 
the lattice contribution surrounding the As nucleus. The 
doping evolution of vq, the spectral shapes, and the sin- 
gle component of T\ indicate that the electron carriers 
were homogeneously doped for x > 0.06, but phase sep- 
aration occurs in x — 0.03 and 0.04. We speculate that 
this may be due to the local distribution of the F ion 
around the As nucleus, which is inevitable in a quite low- 
doping region. Remarkably, the T dependences of \jT\ 
measured at each peak of X = 0.03 and 0.04 indicate 
that each phase is homogeneous. The same behavior was 
found in Rcf.[22], where the vq is quite similar to ours 
alth oug h the nominal x there is larger than ours by ~ 
0.02 [ilj. Figure 1(b) shows the T evolution of the NQR 
spectra for x = 0.03. Below TV = 58 K, the spectra are 
broadened due to an antiferromagnetic order. 

Figures 2(a) and 2(b) show the T dependence of 1/Ti 
for all samples. For x = 0.03, 1/Ti shows a small upturn 



0.0001 




'As-NQR 



a x = 0.03 

V x = 0.04(L) 

o x = 0.04(H) 

• x = 0.06 



(b) 




10 100 

T(K) 



10 100 

T(K) 



FIG. 2: (color online) The T dependences of 1/Ti for x = 0.03, 
0.04 and 0.06 (a) and for x = 0.08, 0.10, and 0.15 (b). Data for 
x = 0.03 were collected at the high-frequency (H) NQR peaks. 
For x — 0.04, 1/Ti was measured at both the low- frequency 
(L) and the H peak. Solid curves below T c for x > 0.04 
are the simulations based on a s wave superconducting gap 
model with impurity scattering (see the text). The dashed 
line indicates the relation 1/Ti cc T 3 . The dotted and solid 
arrows indicate Tn and T c , respectively. 



Before going into the detail of the superconducting 
state, we first discuss the normal-state property. For 
this purpose, we plot \jT\T vs T in Fig. 3. None of 
the samples shows a Korringa relation \jT\T = const, 
expected for a conventional metal. Above Tn of x = 
0.03, 1/TiT increases with decreasing T due to the AFSF. 
Such AFSF persists in x = 0.04, 0.06, and 0.08, where 
\jT{T increases with decreasing T down to T c . To model 
the 1/TiT above Tjy or T c , we employed the th eory 
for a weakly antiferromagnetically-correlated metal |23j j , 
l/^T =(1/T 1 T) AF +(1/T 1 T) = C/(T + 9) + (\/T x T) . 
Here, the first term described the contribution from the 
antiferromagnetic wave vector, and the second term is 
the contribution from the density of states (DOS) at the 
Fermi level. For x = 0.03, 9 is simply — TV, where the 
data can be well fitted except around Tjv [24|. As seen 
in Fig. 3, 1/TiT for x = 0.04, 0.06, and 0.08 are well 



'o 







U' 








i ■ i ■ 




• x = 0.06 










Ax = 0.08 


* ». 








♦ x = 0.10 


4 s 

A ^S 




* 




D x = 0.15 


♦ 


♦ ♦ 

n 


1 .< 


D 
D 

n 
n 


n 




W* 


, 


i 






= 0.03 



).04(L) 
1.04(H) 



fi * ~% [5* B V fi A 



250 



300 



FIG. 3: (color online) T dependence of \/T\T for various x. 
The curves above Tn or T c are fits to the AFSF theory (see 
the text). The inset is the enlarged part for 0.06 < x < 0.15. 



reproduced by this model with 9 ~ 10, 25 and 39 K, 
respectively. The low-frequency NQR peak for x — 0.04 
gives a smaller fl~5K. The increase of 9 with increasing 
x means that the system moves away from the magnetic 
instability (MI) where 9 = K. With further doping, for 
x = 0.10 and 0.15, no enhancement of \jT\T is seen. 
Instead, \jT\T decreases with decreasing T, which was 
recently explained by the loss of the DOS due to a topo- 
logical change of the Fermi surface [9j, |25j . The results 
in previous reports of the lack of the AFSF for x > 0.10 
12J, [TJ, LL5J are consistent with our results for x = 0.10 



and 0.15. 

The remarkable finding is that the highest T c — 27 K is 
realized at x = 0.06, which is away from the MI. This situ- 
ation is quite similar to the cuprates La2- K Sr :r Cu04 26]. 
In the scenario of spin fluctuation-mediated supercon- 
ductivity, this can be understood as follows. At high 
doping levels, the decrease of T c is due to the weaken- 
ing of the AFSF. In the vicinity of the MI, on the other 
hand, the too strong low-energy fluctuation acts as pair 
breaking|27]. Therefore, a maximal T c is realized at some 
point away from the MI with moderate AFSF. 

Figure 4 shows the phase diagram for LaFeAsOi-^F-r 
obtained in the present study. The most important find- 
ing is that the highest T c is found in the low-doping 
regime, which makes our T c vs x relation look like a 
dome shape. In the previous study [l|, [28|, the fail- 
ure of obtaining higher T c in the low-doping regime 
is probably due to sample inhomogeneity as evidenced 
by the broader (in fact, two-peak- featured) NQR spec- 
trum [29:] . The present phase diagram is consistent with 



that for Ba(Fei_ 2; Coi C )2As2[7| but is somewhat different 
from that for BaFe? (Asi -^P^)? [10] . whose T c shows a 
maximum around 9 — 0. This slight difference may 
originate from the difference of the tuning parameter 
for their ground states. The ground states for both 
LaFeAsOi-^Fa; and Ba(Fei_^Co z ,)2As2 are tuned by 
electron doping. On the other hand, isovalent P dop- 
ing acts as chemical pressure on BaFe2(Asi_ a; P 2 ,)2. In 
any case, these phase diagrams support the intimate re- 
lationship between AFSF and superconductivity in iron 
arsenides. Furthermore, such a phase diagram has consis- 
tently been found in high-T c cuprate La 2 - 2; Sr a .Cu04 26] 
and heavy fermion compounds [30j, indicating that the 
AFSF plays a significant role to induce superconductiv- 
ity in strongly correlated electron systems in general. 



(a) 



Q5 



(b) 



^ 



45 

30 
15 


60 



a 

in 
<U 
O, 30 



£ 



15 







- 




/ 


- 




/ 


/ 






/ 

/ 

/ 




■ 




/ 

-A 






T 

N 


LaFeAsOi 


-X-Tx 


AF 






■ 




• 


T 






• 


• c 


■ 


- 


sc 


• 


4 











0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 

F-content (x) 

FIG. 4: (color online) Phase diagram obtained in this study. 
AF and SC denote the antiferromagnetically ordered and su- 
perconducting states, respectively, (a) x dependence of 9. 
The dotted line is a guide to the eyes. The shade indicates 
the region of phase separation, (b) x dependence of Tn and 
T c determined by NQR measurements. 

Next, we turn to the superconducting state. Figure 
5(a) shows the T dependence of \jT\ for x = 0.06. Be- 
low T c , 1/Ti decreases steeply due to the opening of the 
superconducting gaps. The hump structure at T ~ 0.4 
T c is due to the multiple-gap character as reported for 
other compounds [4j-|6j, [8(. The T variation at low T is 
much stronger than T 3 , and even stronger than T 5 , as 
can be clearly seen in the figure. In fact, 1/Ti decreases 
exponentially below 0.4 T c . In Fig. 5(b), we plotted 1/Ti 
against T c /T in a semilogarithmic scale. As indicated by 



the solid line, the 1/Ti below T ~ 0.4 T c clearly fol- 
lows the relation 1/Ti oc exp(— A /fcsT) with Aq/ ksT c 
= 1.8, where A and fcs denote the gap size at T = and 
the Boltzmann constant, respectively. This is clear and 
direct evidence that the superconducting state is fully 
gapped in LaFeAsO0.94F0.06- 



( a ) 10 



0.1 



0.01 



0.001 



0.0001 




5 As-NQR 



10 100 

T(K) 



FIG. 5: (color online) (a) The T dependence of 1/Ti for x 
= 0.06. (b) Semilogarithmic plot of 1/Ti vs T c /T. The solid 
line represents the relation 1/Ti oc exp(— — j0- 



The evolution of the superconducting-state properties 
can be seen in Fig. 2. For x — 0.06-0.10, 1/Ti shows a 
marked hump structure around T ~ 0.4 T c and is followed 
by a still sharper decrease below. However, the low-T 
behavior of 1/T) changes gradually, as to decrease less 
and less steeply as x increases. Eventually, for x = 0.15, 
the hump structure disappears completely. Instead, a 
simple T dependence emerges which is close to T 3 . Such 
T 3 behavior has been reported previously |12h14 and 
was taken as evidence for line nodes. Below we show 
that it is a consequence of impurity scattering. Namely, 
the T 3 is an accidental one rather than an intrinsic one. 
In fact, in Bai_ x K x Fe2As2, the low-T behavior of 1/Ti 
also changes when the sample purity differs 

Assuming sign reversing s-wave symmetry 
impurity scattering, one can reproduce the evolution of 
the 1/Ti below T c . By introducing the impurity scatter- 
ing parameter r\ in the energy spectrum in the form of 
E = uj+ii], the 1/Ti in the superconducting state is given 




with 



by 



Ti(T c ) 



~~ 4T J- 



Ti(T) ' T 4T 

W GG = [(Re{(w 



^%(VF GG + Wff) [3| where 
+ iT,)/J(u> + ir,)* + \A(k F )\*}) kw } 2 



and W FF = [(Re{l/v/(a; + irtf + |A(A; F )| 2 }A(fc F )) feF ] 2 . 
Here the A is the gap parameter, and (. . .) is the 
average over the entire Fermi surface, and runs over 
three bands consisting of two hole pockets at the T 
point and an electron pocket at the M point, respec- 



TABLE I: The fitting parameters AJ" ( = A 3 ), A 2 , r\ in the unit 
of k B T c , and Ni:N 2 :N 3 . 



X 


Tc(K) 


A+ A- 


n 


Nv.Nr.Na 


0.04(L) 


21 


4.50 0.93 


0.39 


0.335:0.330:0.335 


0.04(H) 


21 


4.58 1.63 


0.27 


0.38:0.24:0.38 


0.06 


27 


5.62 1.11 


0.006 


0.30:0.40:0.30 


0.08 


23 


3.37 0.92 


0.03 


0.303:0.394:0.303 


0.10 


18 


3.00 0.83 


0.035 


0.305:0.39:0.305 


0.15 


12 


2.62 0.79 


0.15 


0.31:0.38:0.31 



tively [3S]. Namely, for a quantity F, (T [A(k F )]) kp = 
[7ViT(A+) + N 2 F{Az) + iV 3 F(Aa )] /(JVi + N 2 + N 3 ), 
where Ni is the DOS coming from band i (i = 1,2,3). 
Here, it is tempting to assign bands 1, 2, and 3 to the 7, /3, 
and a bands found in angle-resolved photoemission spec- 
troscopy measurement [36j. It is noted that the weaker 
T dependence in the x = 0.15 sample can be understood 
as due to the impurity scattering that brings about a fi- 
nite DOS. For x = 0.04 where two As sites were found, 
1/Ti for each site can also be fitted by the same model, 
with an additional feature that a large 77 is needed to ex- 
plain the low-T behavior. This can be understood if the 
two phases coexist in the nanoscale [22| , where one phase 
acts as an impurity scatterer for the other. The obtained 
fitting parameters are summarized in Table 1. Finally, 
we note that an s ++ wave [37f seems difficult to explain 



the lack of the coherence peak just below T c and the x 
evolution of low-T behavior of 1/Ti. 

In conclusion, we have presented the results of sys- 
tematic NQR measurements on high quality samples of 
LaFeAsOi-zF^ (x = 0.03, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.10, and 
0.15). The AFSF seen above T N = 58 K of x = 0.03 
persists in the 0.04 < x < 0.08 regime. The highest 
T c = 27 K is realized for x — 0.06 which is away from 
the magnetic instability but with significant AFSF. The 
phase diagram closely resembles those of the cuprates 
La2_ 3; Sr 3 ;Cu04 and other iron arsenides, which suggests 
that the AFSF is also important to produce the super- 
conductivity in LaFeAsOi-ajFj,. In x = 0.06, 1/Ti below 
T c decreases exponentially down to 0.13 T c , which un- 
ambiguously indicates that the superconducting gaps are 
fully-opened. The T-variation of 1/Ti below T c is ren- 
dered nonexponential for x either smaller or larger than 
0.06, which is accounted for by impurity scattering. 

We thank M. Ichioka for help in the calculation and K. 
Ishida for useful communication. Work in Okayama was 
supported in part by research grants from MEXT (No. 
22103004 and 23102717). Work in Beijing was supported 
by CAS and NSFC. 



[1] Y. Kamihara, T. Watanabe, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono, 

J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 3296 (2008). 
[2] X. H. Chen, T. Wu, G. Wu, R. H. Liu, H. Chen, and D. 

F. Fang, Nature 453, 761 (2008). 

[3] Z.-A. Ren, W. Lu, J. Yang, W. Yi, X.-L. Shen, Z.-C. Li, 

G.-C. Che, X.-L. Dong, L.-L. Sun, F. Zhou, and Z.-X. 

Zhao, Chin. Phys. Lett. 25, 2215 (2008). 
[4] K. Matano, Z. A. Ren, X. L. Dong, L. L. Sun, Z. X. Zhao, 

and G. -q. Zheng, Europhys. Lett. 83, 57001 (2008). 
[5] S. Kawasaki, K. Shimada, G. F. Chen, J. L. Luo, N. L. 

Wang, and G. -q. Zheng, Phys. Rev. B 78, 220506(R) 

(2008). 
[6] K. Matano, Z. Li, G. L. Sun, D. L. Sun, C. T. Lin, M. 

Ichioka, and G. -q. Zheng, Europhys. Lett. 87, 27012 

(2009). 
[7] F. L. Ning, K. Ahilan, T. Imai, A. S. Sefat, M. A. 

McGuire, B. C. Sales, D. Mandrus, P. Cheng, B. Shen, 

and H.-H Wen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 037001 (2010). 
[8] S. Kawasaki, T. Tabuchi, X. F. Wang, X. H. Chen, and 

G. -q. Zheng, Supercond. Sci. Tech. 23, 054004 (2010). 
[9] T. Tabuchi, Z. Li, T. Oka, G. F. Chen, S. Kawasaki, J. 

L. Luo, N. L. Wang, and G. -q. Zheng, Phys. Rev. B 81, 

140509(R) (2010). 
[10] Y. Nakai, T. lye, S. Kitagawa, K. Ishida, H. Ikeda, S. 

Kasahara, H. Shishido, T. Shibauchi, Y. Matsuda, and 

T. Terashima, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 107003 (2010). 
[11] H. Kinouchi, H. Mukuda, M. Yashima, Y. Kitaoka, P. 

M. Shirage, H. Eisaki, and A. Iyo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 

047002 (2011). 
[12] Y. Nakai, K. Ishida, Y. Kamihara, M. Hirano, and H. 

Hosono, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 073701 (2008). 
[13] H.-J. Grafe, D. Paar, G. Lang, N. J. Curro, G. Behr, 

J. Werner, J. Hamann-Borrero, C. Hess, N. Leps, R. 

Klingeler, and B. Buchner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 047003 

(2008). 
[14] H. Mukuda, N. Terasaki, H. Kinouchi, M. Yashima, 

Y. Kitaoka, S. Suzuki, S. Miyasaka, S. Tajima, K. 

Miyazawa, P. Shirage, H. Kito, H. Eisaki, and A. Iyo, 

J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 093704 (2008). 
[15] Y. Nakai, S. Kitagawa, K. Ishida, Y. Kamihara, M. Hi- 
rano, and H. Hosono, New. J. Phys. 11, 045004 (2009). 
[16] Y. Kobayashi, E. Satomi, S. C. Lee, and M. Sato, J. Phys. 

Soc. Jpn. 79, 093709 (2010). 
[17] C. Martin, M. E. Tillman, H. Kim, M. A. Tanatar, S. 

K. Kim, A. Kreyssig, R. T. Gordon, M. D. Vannette, S. 

Nandi, V. G. Kogan, S. L. Budko, P. C. Canfield, A. I. 

Goldman, and R. Prozorov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 247002 

(2009). 
[18] T. Sato, S. Souma, K. Nakayama, K. Terashima, K. Sug- 

awara, T. Takahashi, Y. Kamihara, M. Hirano, and H. 

Hosono, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 063708 (2008). 
[19] R. S. Gonnelli, D. Daghero, M. Tortello, G. A. Um- 



[20 

[21 

[22 

[23 
[24 

[25 
[26 
[27 
[28 



[29 
[30 

[31 
[32 

[3:5 

[34 

[35 
[36 

[37] 



marino, V. A. Stepanov, R. K. Kremer, J. S. Kim, N. 

D. Zhigadlo, J. Karpinski, Physica C 469, 512 (2009). 

G. F. Chen, Z. Li, G. Li, J. Zhou, D. Wu, J. Dong, W. 

Z. Hu, P. Zheng, Z. J. Chen, H. Q. Yuan, J. Singleton, J. 

L. Luo, and N. L. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 057007 

(2008). 

See Supplemental Material at 

|http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevLett.l08.047001 

for details on sample quality and x dependence of vq . 

G. Lang, H.-J. Grafe, D. Paar, F. Hammerath, K. Man- 

they, G. Behr, J. Werner, and B. Buchner, Phys. Rev. 

Lett. 104, 097001 (2010). 

T. Moriya, Spin fluctuations in itinerant magnetism, 

Springer, 1985, Berlin. 

The deviation may be understood as due to impurity 

scattering by another phase that coexists in the nanoscale 

m. 

H. Ikeda, R. Arita, and J. Kunes, Phys. Rev. B 82, 

024508 (2010). 

S. Ohsugi, Y. Kitaoka, K. Ishida, G. -q. Zheng, and K. 

Asayama, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 63, 700 (1994). 

T. Moriya and K. Ueda, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 63, 1871 

(1994). 

H. Luetkens, H.-H. Klauss, M. Kraken, F. J. Litterst, 

T. Dellmann, R. Klingeler, C. Hess, R. Khasanov, A. 

Amato, C. Baines, M. Kosmala, O. J. Schumann, M. 

Braden, J. Hamann-Borrero, N. Leps, A. Kondrat, G. 

Behr, J. Werner, and B. Buchner, Nature Mater. 8, 305 

(2009). 

S. Kitagawa, Y. Nakai, T. lye, K. Ishida, Y. Kamihara, 

M. Hirano, and H. Hosono, Physica C 470, S282 (2010). 

N. D. Mathur, F. M. Grosche, S. R. Julian, I. R. Walker, 

D. M. Freye, R. K. W. Haselwimmer, and G. G. Lon- 

zarich, Nature 394, 39 (1998). 

Z. Li, D. L. Sun, C. T. Lin, Y. H. Su, J. P. Hu, and G. 

-q. Zheng, Phys. Rev. B 83, 140506(R) (2011) . 

I. I. Mazin, D. J. Singh, M. D. Johannes, and M. H. Du, 

Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 057003 (2008). 

K. Kuroki, S. Onari, R. Arita, H. Usui, Y. Tanaka, H. 

Kontani, and H. Aoki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 087004 

(2008). 

Z. Li, Y. Ooe, X. C. Wang, Q. Q. Liu, C. Q. Jin, M. 

Ichioka, and G. -q. Zheng, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 79, 083702 

(2010). 

D. J. Singh and M. H. Du, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 237003 

(2008). 

H. Ding, P. Richard, K. Nakayama, K. Sugawara, T. 

Arakane, Y. Sekiba, A. Takayama, S. Souma, T. Sato, 

T. Takahashi, Z. Wang, X. Dai, Z. Fang, G. F. Chen, 

J. L. Luo, and N. L. Wang, Europhys. Lett. 83, 47001 

(2008). 

H. Kontani and S. Onari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 157001 

(2010).